Are Firms Underleveraged? An Examination of the Effect of Leverage on Default Probabilities
- 3 May 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 60 (3) , 1427-1459
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00766.x
Abstract
A commonly held view in corporate finance is that firms are less leveraged than they should be, given the potentially large tax benefits of debt. In this paper, I study the effect of firms' leverage on default probabilities as represented by the firms' ratings. Using an instrumental variable approach, I find that the leverage's effect on ratings is three times stronger than it is if the endogeneity of leverage is ignored. This stronger effect results in a higher impact of leverage on the ex ante costs of financial distress, which can offset the current estimates of the tax benefits of debt.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capital structure choice: macroeconomic conditions and financial constraintsJournal of Financial Economics, 2003
- Does Corporate Diversification Destroy Value?The Journal of Finance, 2002
- Market Timing and Capital StructureThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- The Diversification Discount: Cash Flows Versus ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- How Big Are the Tax Benefits of Debt?The Journal of Finance, 2000
- Measuring investment distortions arising from stockholder–bondholder conflictsPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Liquidation costs and capital structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1995
- A Further Empirical Investigation of the Bankruptcy Cost QuestionThe Journal of Finance, 1984
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Specification and Estimation of a Simultaneous-Equation Model with Limited Dependent VariablesInternational Economic Review, 1978