Rectal bleeding and colorectal cancer in general practice: diagnostic study
- 21 October 2000
- Vol. 321 (7267) , 998-999
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7267.998
Abstract
Although most cases of rectal bleeding are due to local conditions, this symptom is a major sign of colorectal cancer. Little research exists on whether to refer a patient with rectal bleeding for further evaluation.1-3 We therefore studied the diagnostic value of rectal bleeding in relation to a subsequent diagnosis of colorectal cancer. In Belgium, a network of sentinel practices, covering 1% of the population, registers epidemiological data.4 The methods used to estimate the denominator (in patient years) have been published.4 We analysed data on all patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed in 1993–4 to evaluate sensitivity (retrospective study). We chose rectal bleeding as the reason for visiting a general practitioner before colorectal cancer was diagnosed as the main outcome measure. To obtain a positive predictive value (prospective part of study), we included all patients presenting with rectal bleeding in 1993-4. Our reference standard was colorectal cancer diagnosed …Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rectal bleedingDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1989
- Tool for Validation of the Network of Sentinel General Practitioners in the Belgian Health Care SystemInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- HOW IMPORTANT IS RECTAL BLEEDING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOWEL CANCER AND POLYPS?The Lancet, 1986