Consumption, Debt and Portfolio Choice: Testing the Effect of Bankruptcy Law
Preprint
- 5 March 2002
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Consumer bankruptcy laws, which vary across states and over time, permit debtors to keep assets below a statutory exemption while debts are forgiven. High exemptions distort household portfolio decisions and tempt households to default on debts; but they also provide a crude form of consumption insurance. We combine information on state-level bankruptcy laws with the Consumer Expenditure Survey from 1984--1999. We find that higher exemptions are associated with (1) Higher bankruptcy rates, (2) Households that are more likely to simultaneously hold low-return liquid assets and owe high-cost unsecured debt, and (3) Better insurance for renters and worse insurance for homeowners.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bankruptcy Decision MakingJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2001
- Forum Shopping and Personal BankruptcySSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Serial bankruptcy: plan infeasibility or just bad luck?Applied Economics Letters, 2001
- Credit Cards: Use and Consumer Attitudes, 1970-2000Federal Reserve Bulletin, 2000
- Determinants of the Consumer Bankruptcy DecisionThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Personal Liabilities and Bankruptcy Reform: An International PerspectiveInternational Finance, 1998
- How Important Is Precautionary Saving?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- How does Future Income Affect Current Consumption?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- The Buffer-Stock Theory of Saving: Some Macroeconomic EvidenceBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992
- Saving in Developing Countries: Theory and ReviewThe World Bank Economic Review, 1989