Weight-for-stature compared with body mass index–for-age growth charts for the United States from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background: The 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts for the United States include population reference data for body mass index (BMI)-for-age (ages 2–19 y) and weight-for-stature (from 77 to 121 cm). For younger children, either set of reference data could be used. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare BMI-for-age with weight-for-stature. Design: We used data for 4348 children (aged 2–5 y) from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Weight-for-stature and BMI-for-age percentiles were calculated for each child. The 10th and 85th percentiles of weight-for-stature at selected ages were also reexpressed as BMI-for-age percentiles. Results: More than 63% of children had lower weight-for-stature than BMI-for-age percentiles. Children were more likely to be classified as ≤10th percentile by weight-for-stature than by BMI-for-age, but less likely to be classified as ≥85th percentile. Differences in classification by the 2 measures varied with age and stature and were greater for shorter children. The 10th and 85th percentiles of weight-for-stature corresponded to BMI-for-age percentiles from the 3rd to the 21st percentile and from the 74th to the 92nd percentile, respectively, depending on age and stature. Conclusions: Weight-for-stature is easier to use than BMI-for-age. However, BMI-for-age captures changes in the weight-height relation with age and can be used continuously up to the age of 20 y. BMI-for-age is recommended in most situations. BMI-for-age and weight-for-stature will not give identical results and are not interchangeable.