Dyslexic and nondyslexic reading fluency: Rapid automatized naming and the importance of continuous lists
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Vol. 16 (3) , 567-572
- https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.16.3.567
Abstract
Rapid automatized naming (RAN; Denckla & Rudel, 1976) tasks are consistent predictors of fluency that also discriminate between dyslexic and nondyslexic reading groups. The component processes of RAN that are responsible for its relationship with reading ability remain underspecified, however. We report a study on dyslexic and nondyslexic adult groups that experimentally manipulated RAN formats to elucidate how different components of RAN differentially influence dyslexic and nondyslexic performance. The dyslexic group showed a pervasive deficit in rapid access of individually presented items. Additionally, they showed a significant impairment when multiple items were presented, whereas nondyslexic readers showed marginal facilitation for this format. We discuss the implications of these findings with respect to reading-group differences in reading fluency.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) Taps a Mechanism That Places Constraints on the Development of Early Reading FluencyPsychological Science, 2009
- Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking studyCognition, 2008
- Visual target detection is not impaired in dyslexic readersVision Research, 2008
- Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-reviewVision Research, 2008
- What Phonological Deficit?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2008
- Rapid Naming Speed Components and Early Reading AcquisitionScientific Studies of Reading, 2006
- Perhaps correlational but not causal: No effect of dyslexic readers’ magnocellular system on their eye movements during readingNeuropsychologia, 2005
- Individual differences in RAN and reading: a response timing analysisJournal of Research in Reading, 2005
- The double-deficit hypothesis and difficulties in learning to read a regular orthography.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000
- Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilitiesNeuropsychologia, 1976