Comparison of Electromagnetic and Seismic-Gravity Ice Thickness Measurements in East Antarctica

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The errors involved in ice thickness determinations in Antarctica by seismic reflection shooting, gravity observations and radio-echo sounding are briefly discussed. Relative accuracies of 3%, 7-10% and 1.5% have been suggested. Double checks of ice depths from radar sounding in east Antarctica indicate an internal consistency of measurement for this technique of <1%. Comparison of carefully executed seismic shooting and routine radio-echo sounding results against absolute ice thickness values from two deep core drilling sites show no significant differences between these two remote methods (i.e. both are better than 1.5%).Over 60 comparisons are examined between radar ice thicknesses and over-snow measurements obtained on eight independent traverses in east Antarctica. Three traverses exhibit consistently unacceptable results-U.S. Victoria Land Traverse II (southern leg), Commonwealth Transanlarctic Expedition and the U.S.S.R. Vostok to South Pole Traverse—which probably result from misinterpretation of “noisy” seismograms. The remaining comparisons indicate mean differences, including some navigational uncertainty, of ≈3%, <8% and 5% between radio-echo and (1) seismic, (2) gravity, and (3) gravity tied to seismic determinations, respectively.