Salinity effects on St. Augustinegrass: A novel system to quantify stress response1
- 30 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Plant Nutrition
- Vol. 12 (7) , 893-908
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01904168909364001
Abstract
An objective and quantitative batch nutrient culture system was developed to assess responses of St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum [Walt.] Kuntze) cultivars ''Seville'' (saline tolerant) and ''Floratam'' (saline sensitive) to salt stress. Vessels containing individual grass plugs growing in solution culture were randomized in a walk-in growth chamber. Nutrient solutions were supplemented weekly with NaCl to gradually increase the conductivity over a three week period to treatment levels (2.4 [control], 12.4, 22.4, and 32.4 dS m-1). Plants were sampled at the onset, and at four and eight weeks during the experiment. Cell sap was extracted from grass blades and measured with a vapor pressure osmometer to determine osmolarity and osmotic adjustment. Length and area of sample shoot and root systems and foliage color changes were measured using an adaptation of video image analysis, and dry weight (DW) was measured to determine relative growth rate (RGR). ''Seville'' responded to increasing salt concentration with uniform stepwise increases in cell osmoloarity, whereas ''Floratam'' showed strong depression of cell osmotic potential only in the highest conductivity treatment. At high salt levels, overall shoot development was initially more inhibited for ''Floratam'', although RGR analysis indicated recovery in the susceptible cultivar after long salt stress duration. ''Seville'' reacted to saline stress with increased root length, whereas roots were actually stunted in saline treatments for ''Floratam''. Stress induced an increase in the optical density of grass blades for both cultivars although foliage color was not visibly affected. A positive linear correlation (r = 0.81 - 0.97) was obtained between shoot area as determined by image analysis versus DW measurements. Use of this novel system maximizes assessment of turfgrass stress responses, and quantification of resistance characteristics.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- An evaluation of methods for measuring cell osmolarity with invitroand invivogrownLycopersiconplantsCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1988
- Rapid, nondestructive measurement of chlorophyll content in leaves with nonuniform chlorophyll distributionPhotosynthesis Research, 1988
- Cool‐Season Turfgrass Responses to Drought Stress1Crop Science, 1987
- A Method for Evaluation of Salt Tolerance during Germination, Emergence, and Seedling Establishment1Agronomy Journal, 1987
- Advances in salt tolerancePlant and Soil, 1987
- An evaluation of MES (2(N‐Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid) and amberlite IRC‐50 as pH buffers for nutrient solution studies∗Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1985
- Effect of NaCl on the Growth of Whole Plants and Their Corresponding Callus CulturesFunctional Plant Biology, 1981
- Registration of Seville st. Augustinegrass1 (Reg. No. 66)Crop Science, 1980
- Salinity Tolerance of Seven Varieties of Creeping Bentgrass, Agrostis palustris Huds.Agronomy Journal, 1967
- Osmotic Adjustment of Plants to Saline Media. II. Dynamic PhaseAmerican Journal of Botany, 1963