Tumour localization of uroporphyrin isomers I and III and their correlation to albumin and serum protein binding
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Cell Biochemistry and Function
- Vol. 1 (3) , 156-160
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cbf.290010307
Abstract
We were the first to report the superiority of uroporphyrin I (UROP I) as a tumour localizer when compared to haematoporphyrin derivative (HPD). In this study, we compared both isomers of UROP, i.e. I and III, in a KHJJ mammary carcinoma mouse model. Six and 18 h after UROP administration, the tumour, skin and gut porphyrin (P) content was quantitated. Tumour UROP I levels were always at least 50% higher than UROP III in tumour, whereas both isomers were barely detectable in the skin and gastrointestinal tract. We then explored the possibility that tumour P uptake might relate in part to the affinity of circulating P to mouse serum proteins (MSP), in particular, the major binding protein constituent, albumin. Copro‐P III, deutero‐P 2,4 disulphonic acid (DP), proto‐P IX (PP) and heptacarboxylic P I (Hepta I) which in our mouse tumour model do not localize in malignant tissue, were compared to UROP I and III. The P was mixed with 0.775 μM human serum albumin (HSA) at different molar ratios (HSA:P range 2–8) and the unbound P concentration quantitated using an Amicon CF‐25 membrane cone with centrifugation. The percentage free P was significantly higher for UROP I (92–98%) than III (82–95%) and significantly more than that observed with non‐tumour localizing P studied. Similar data were obtained with MSP. This is consistent with the notion that enhanced uptake and retention (particularly UROP I) by malignant neoplastic tissue might reflect a higher affinity for UROP by tumour constituents than by circulating proteins. We conclude, (i) that serum proteins, particularly albumin, may play a significant role in governing the localization of P in tissues and, (ii) UROP clinically is ideally suited as a diagnostic marker of pre‐ or early mucosal malignancy as minimal retention by skin and gut would increase fluorescence specificity and diminish photocutaneous side effects.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The main photosensitizing components of hematoporphyrin derivativeCancer Letters, 1982
- INTERACTION OF HUMAN SERUM ALBUMIN WITH HEMATOPORPHYRIN AND ITS ZN2+‐AND FE3+‐DERIVATIVESInternational Journal of Peptide and Protein Research, 1981
- Photoradiation Therapy for Cutaneous and Subcutaneous MalignanciesJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1981
- Fluorimetric study of the binding of protoporphyrin to haemopexin and albuminBiochemical Journal, 1981
- The interaction of human serum albumin and hemopexin with porphyrinsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure, 1980
- The chemistry of pyrrolic compounds. XLV. Haematoporphyrin derivative: haematoporphyrin diacetate as the main product of the reaction of haematoporphyrin with a mixture of acetic and sulfuric acidsAustralian Journal of Chemistry, 1980
- PORPHYRIN‐BINDING PROTEINS IN SERUM*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1975
- Hematoporphyrin-derivative-fluorescence test colposcopy and colpophotography in the diagnosis of atypical metaplasia, dysplasia, and carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteriAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1973
- Hematoporphyrin-Derivative Fluorescence in Malignant NeoplasmsAnnals of Surgery, 1968
- HEMATOPORPHYRIN DERIVATIVE: A NEW AID FOR ENDOSCOPIC DETECTION OF MALIGNANT DISEASEThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1961