An Interactionist Analysis of Small Group Peer Assessment
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Behavior
- Vol. 17 (1) , 19-37
- https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648601700102
Abstract
This research investigates the relative and interactive effects of rater-, ratee-, relationship-, situational-, and group-level contingencies on peer assessments of open communication. A round-robin analysis of variance and covariance was used to analyze peer ratings for 54 subjects participating in 9 small groups on two occasions. The results suggest that, given certain procedural conditions, peer assessments are highly reliable and valid. Rater bias accounted for a relatively small amount of rating variance. Ratings were best predicted by stable individual differences associated with ratees and situational contingencies. The results are discussed in light of the current controversy surroundingpeer assessments and the utility of an interactionist approach for understanding communication behavior in small group settings.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peer assessment revisited: A brief comment on Kane and Lawler.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- Splitting the reciprocity correlation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Methods of peer assessment.Psychological Bulletin, 1978
- Norms affecting self-disclosure in men and women.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976
- Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique.Psychological Review, 1973
- Do Personality Traits Apply to Social Behaviour?Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 1972
- Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐makingSpeech Monographs, 1970
- The consistency of ratings by peers.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1960
- Some factors in self-disclosure.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1958
- Pressures Toward Uniformity of Performance in GroupsHuman Relations, 1957