Providing Professional Mammography Services: Financial Analysis
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 219 (2) , 467-473
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma18467
Abstract
To perform a financial analysis of mammography services to determine whether the key underlying economic drivers of this service are aligned with the public's expectations. The financial status of mammography services at seven university-based programs was assessed by using an extensive financial survey encompassing revenue, direct and indirect costs, and volume data for 1997 and 1998. At one of the institutions, an activity-based costing analysis was performed by procedure type: screening mammography, diagnostic mammography, breast ultrasonography, interventional procedures, and review of outside mammograms. All seven institutions incurred losses in the professional component of mammography services. The underlying financial problem was a negative contribution margin (total mammography revenues minus direct expenses). The driver of the financial loss was the volume of diagnostic mammograms, which generated a loss per procedure. Diagnostic mammogram volume drove the mammography full-time equivalent count (P =.039) and was highly and negatively correlated with contribution margin (P <.001). The reimbursement rate for mammography procedures, especially diagnostic mammography, needs to be increased to reflect the current reality of the resources necessary to maintain the accessibility and accuracy of this evolving mix of clinical services.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential Contribution of Computer-aided Detection to the Sensitivity of Screening MammographyRadiology, 2000
- Diagnostic Radiology Residents in the Classes of 1999 and 2000American Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Diagnostic Radiologists' Subspecialization and Fields of PracticeAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Changes in the Market for Diagnostic Radiologists as Measured Through a Help Wanted IndexAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2000
- Screening versus diagnostic mammography.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1999
- Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.Radiology, 1998
- False-negative core biopsy of the breast.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1998
- Evaluation of the mammographic abnormality.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Variability in the Interpretation of Screening Mammograms by US RadiologistsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations.Radiology, 1990