Einflu von au enfaktoren auf den fortpflanzungsmodus heterogoner rotatorien
- 1 January 1972
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 9 (3) , 203-214
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00345231
Abstract
Monogonont rotifers reproduce parthenogenetically or sexually. The proportion of sexual females in a population (rate of mixis) can be modified by external factors. Published data about these factors are inconsistent and in part even contradictory (Table 1). In summer 1967 we made quantitative plankton studies in 15 tanks (0.3 to 50 m3). The following parameters were recorded every third day: population density, egg rate (eggs/female), and rate of mixis of the three rotifer species Brachionus calyciflorus, B. rubens and B. angularis; pH, temperature, rainfall, and phytoplankton biomass (dry weight). The latter was subdivided into three categories: ultra, nanno and micro-plankton. A correlation analysis of the environmental factors revealed many intercorrelations (Table 2). The coefficients of correlation between each rate of mixis and all other parameters are given in Table 3. A most striking result is the absence of significant correlations among the rates of mixis of the three species. This means that the periods of sexuality of the three related species are independent of one another in the same biotope. No one factor shows a consistent positive or negative correlation with the rates of mixis of all three species. But there are no contradictions, i.e., none of the parameters is correlated positively in one species and negatively in another species. Positive correlations (or none) are demonstrated with temperature, changing of temperature, and micro-phytoplankton; negative correlations (or none) with total phytoplankton, ultra-phytoplankton, nanno-phytoplankton, eggs/female, and population density of the competing Brachionus species; in no case are significant correlations found with pH and rainfall. That factors with significant correlations do not show these correlations with all species could be due to different threshold values of the mixis-inducing factors in the three rotifer species. In one respect our analysis is at variance with previous findings: whereas in all published data the population growth rate promotes the rate of mixis, we find in no case a significantly positive correlation between the rate of mixis and the population growth rate, or the rate of eggs/female. In some cases we find a significantly negative correlation. At present it is difficult to decide, whether the significant factors influence the rate of mixis directly or indirectly. The intercorrelations of the factors (Table 2) suggest that in many if not most cases these influences are indirect. tionsdichte von B. calyciflorus (bei B. rubens). Der letzte Effekt ist wahrscheinlich auf Konkurrenz zurückzuführen (Halbach, in Vorbereitung).Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Parthenogenesis in Rotifers: The Control of Sexual and Asexual ReproductionAmerican Zoologist, 1971
- SOME NOTES ON THE CONTROL OF SEXUALITY IN THE ROTIFER ASPLANCHNA SIEBOLDI1Limnology and Oceanography, 1971
- The developmental genetics of polymorphism in the rotiferAsplanchna. III. Quantitative modification of developmental responses to vitamin E, by the genome, physiological state, and population density of responding femalesJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1969
- Der Einfluß der Temperatur auf die Bisexualität von AsplanchnaThe Science of Nature, 1966
- Die Determination der heterogonen Fortpflanzungsarten bei den R dertierenThe Science of Nature, 1965
- Studies on the physiology and genetics of the rotifer, Asplanchna. I. Methods and physiologyJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1964
- Mictic female production in the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorusJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1963
- Studies on Vigor in the Rotifer Hydatina sentaPhysiological Zoology, 1942
- Male Production in Crowded and Uncrowded Cultures of the Rotifer Hydatina sentaPhysiological Zoology, 1929
- The Production of Males and Females Controlled by Food Conditions in Hydatina sentaScience, 1914