Corruption, Structural Reforms, and Economic Performance in the Transition Economies
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by International Monetary Fund (IMF) in IMF Working Papers
- Vol. 00 (132)
- https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451855371.001
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the adverse impact of corruption on economic performance. This paper advances the hypothesis that corruption is largely a symptom of underlying weaknesses in public policies and institutions, a formulation that provides deeper insights into economic performance than do measures of “perceived corruption.” The hypothesis is tested by assessing the relative importance of structural reforms vs. corruption in explaining macroeconomic performance in the transition economies. The paper finds that for four widely used measures of economic performance—growth, inflation, the fiscal balance, and foreign direct investment—structural reforms tend to dominate the corruption variable.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Controlling CorruptionPublished by University of California Press ,2019
- The Transition Economies After Ten YearsIMF Working Papers, 2000
- Bureaucratic Corruption and Endogenous Economic GrowthJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Corruption and GovernmentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1999
- Tax Reform in the Baltics, Russia, and Other Countries of the Former Soviet UnionPublished by International Monetary Fund (IMF) ,1999
- The Place of the Soft Budget Constraint Syndrome in Economic TheoryJournal of Comparative Economics, 1998
- Cleaning up and invigorating the civil servicePublic Administration and Development, 1997
- Tax Effort in Sub-Saharan AfricaIMF Working Papers, 1997
- Do Government Wage Cuts Close Budget Deficits? Costs of CorruptionStaff Papers, 1996
- Fiscal developments: An overviewMOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies, 1996