BARRIERS TO PARTICIPATION IN RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER AMONG AUSTRALIAN CANCER SPECIALISTS
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 69 (7) , 486-491
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01608.x
Abstract
Background: Doctors’ discomfort with the randomized trial process may significantly impact on accrual rates to clinical trials. However, there is little information regarding factors that influence accrual to clinical trials in Australia. The present study examines Australian cancer specialists’ attitudes towards and participation in current breast cancer clinical trials. Methods: All medical and radiation oncologists across Australia and surgeons listed as participants in the Australian and New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group were sent questionnaires assessing attitudes towards and participation in current clinical trials for early stage breast cancer. Results: The response rate was 71% (269/381). The mean age of respondents was 45 years and 85% were male. Respondents estimated that a mean of 5.2 (SD = 8.2) of their patients had been enrolled in a breast cancer clinical trial in the previous 12 months. Participation (in any trial) by medical oncologists (60.6%, 95%CI 54.5–66.7%) and surgeons (63.1%, 95%CI 57.1–69.1%) was significantly higher than for radiation oncologists (43.2%, 95%CI 37–49.4%, P = 0.03). The major barriers to participation in current breast cancer trials were lack of resources (44%) or issues related to specific trials (44%; e.g. relevance of the research questions or choice of standard therapies). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that efforts to improve doctors’ participation in clinical trials need to address a number of issues. More empirical research is needed to evaluate new strategies to raise participation in clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctors' participation in randomized trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: how does it relate to their recommendations for standard therapy in breast cancer?The Breast, 1999
- Effects of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Early Breast Cancer — An Overview of the Randomized TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- An Ethical Debate: Financial ties as part of informed consent to postmarketing research Attitudes of American doctors and patientBMJ, 1995
- Radiotherapy in the curative treatment of breast cancer: current status and future trends an opinion sample of radiation oncologists active in breast cancer researchRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1994
- Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapyThe Lancet, 1992
- Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literatureSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Clinical trials in cancer therapy: Efforts to improve patient enrollment by community oncologistsMedical and Pediatric Oncology, 1991
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Impediments to recruitment in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Response and resolutionControlled Clinical Trials, 1984
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984