Large-Scale Learning Disability Identification: The Reprieve of a Concept
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Exceptional Children
- Vol. 52 (1) , 44-51
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298505200105
Abstract
The conceptual and operational definition of a learning disability has long been discussed, and the debate has been intensified by recent large-scale investigations. This article presents the results from a large sample of referral and learning disability children and interprets them as being consistent with the contention that learning disability is a viable concept that can be meaningfully used. The premature elimination of the concept in favor of more general constructs, such as low achievement, was rejected. Upon closer evaluation, the alternate concepts will lead to as many ambiguities, inconsistencies, and misapplications as does the concept of learning disabilities. Systematic and extensive empirical evaluation of various operational definitions, including very general ones such as low achievement, provides the only logical way to clarify the issues.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The regression equation method of determining academic discrepancyJournal of School Psychology, 1984
- Learning Disabilities as a Subset of School Failure: The Over-Sophistication of a ConceptExceptional Children, 1983
- The fallacy of “two years below grade level for age” as a diagnostic criterion for reading disordersJournal of School Psychology, 1982
- Quantifying a Severe Discrepancy: A Critical AnalysisLearning Disability Quarterly, 1981
- Characteristics of Children Enrolled in the Child Service Demonstration CentersJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1975