Meta-analyses and Forest plots using a microsoft excel spreadsheet: step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Research Notes
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-6
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-52
Abstract
Meta-analyses are necessary to synthesize data obtained from primary research, and in many situations reviews of observational studies are the only available alternative. General purpose statistical packages can meta-analyze data, but usually require external macros or coding. Commercial specialist software is available, but may be expensive and focused in a particular type of primary data. Most available softwares have limitations in dealing with descriptive data, and the graphical display of summary statistics such as incidence and prevalence is unsatisfactory. Analyses can be conducted using Microsoft Excel, but there was no previous guide available. We constructed a step-by-step guide to perform a meta-analysis in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, using either fixed-effect or random-effects models. We have also developed a second spreadsheet capable of producing customized forest plots. It is possible to conduct a meta-analysis using only Microsoft Excel. More important, to our knowledge this is the first description of a method for producing a statistically adequate but graphically appealing forest plot summarizing descriptive data, using widely available software.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forest plots in reports of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study reviewing current practiceInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic dataBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisPublished by Wiley ,2009
- Development and validation of MIX: comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research dataBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Systematic Reviews in Health CarePublished by Wiley ,2001
- Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyA Proposal for ReportingJAMA, 2000