When Should One Subtract Background Fluorescence in cDNA Microarrays?

Preprint
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
  • 1 January 2004
    • preprint
      • Published in RePEc
Abstract
Complementary DNA (cDNA) microarrays are a powerful tool for genomic analysis, but have noise components that make inferences regarding gene expression inefficient and potentially misleading. Background fluorescence, whether attributable to non-specific binding or other sources, is an important component of noise. The decision to subtract background fluorescence from foreground signal has been controversial, with no clear criteria for determining circumstances that may favor, or disfavor, background correction. While it is generally accepted that subtracting background reduces bias but ncreases variance in the estimates of the ratios of interest,no formal analysis of the bias-variance trade off of background subtraction has been undertaken. In this paper, we use simulation to systematically examine the bias-variance trade off under a variety of possible experimental conditions. Our simulation is based on data obtained from a self versus self microarray experiment and is free of distributional assumptions. Our results identify factors that are important for determining whether to background subtract,including the correlation of foreground to background signal. Using these results we develop recommendations for diagnostic visualizations that can help decisions about background subtraction.
All Related Versions

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: