Towards an understanding of the bonding in polyoxometalates through bond order and bond energy analysis
- 13 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Faraday Discussions
- Vol. 124, 239-258
- https://doi.org/10.1039/b210795n
Abstract
The molecular and electronic structures of transition metal complexes, [MOCl5]n− (n = 2 for M = V,Nb,Ta and n = 1 for Mo,W) and mixed-metal polyoxometalates, [M′M5O19]3− (M′ = V,Nb,Ta, M = Mo,W) containing a single terminal oxo group on each metal, and of complexes of the uranyl ion [UO2]2+, [UO2(H2O)5]2+ and [UO2Cl4]2−, have been calculated using density functional methods. The calculated structures of the complexes are in good agreement with available experimental parameters. For the mixed-metal hexametalates, for which no crystallographic data is available, the calculations predict a small tetragonal compression of the clusters with only minor structural changes compared to the parent molybdate and tungstate. The metal–oxygen bonding in these anions has been probed using Mayer–Mulliken, bond energy and atoms in molecule analyses (AIM). These methods provide a consistent description of the bonding in polyoxometalates. The terminal bonds between transition metal or uranium and oxygen atoms have large σ and π components with the π contributions exceeding the σ bonding. The transition metals utilize their d orbitals almost exclusively to bond to oxygen whilst uranium uses both its 5f and 6d orbitals. Oxygen atom charges increase and covalency indexes decrease with coordination number, with a marked separation of these terms according to the oxygen atom type. The total valency and AIM energies of the oxygen atoms are predicted to be almost constant for all types of oxygen site. The constancy of the bonding power of the oxygen atoms appears to be an important factor in determining the gross structures and details of the bonding in polyoxometalates. The Mayer–Mulliken approach provides direct characterization of the bonding power of atoms and the extent of the interaction between pairs of atoms that is consistent with the results of the considerably more computationally demanding bond energy and AIM approaches.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electronic Structure of the α and β Isomers Of [Mo8O26]4-Inorganic Chemistry, 2002
- Structure and Bonding in [M6O19]n-IsopolyanionsInorganic Chemistry, 2002
- A DFT Study of the Electronic Spectrum of the α-Keggin Anion [CoIIW12O40]6-Inorganic Chemistry, 2002
- Structure and Bonding in Dinuclear Oxoanions of V, Nb, Ta, Mo, and WThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2001
- Electronic and Magnetic Properties of α-Keggin Anions: A DFT Study of [XM12O40]n-, (M = W, Mo; X = AlIII, SiIV, PV, FeIII, CoII, CoIII ) and [SiM11VO40]m- (M = Mo and W)Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2001
- Electron Delocalization and Magnetic State of Doubly-Reduced PolyoxometalatesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2001
- Computational Study of Analogues of the Uranyl Ion Containing the −NUN− Unit: Density Functional Theory Calculations on UO22+, UON+, UN2, UO(NPH3)3+, U(NPH3)24+, [UCl4{NPR3}2] (R = H, Me), and [UOCl4{NP(C6H5)3}]-Inorganic Chemistry, 2000
- Comparison of ab Initio Hartree−Fock and Kohn−Sham Orbitals in the Calculation of Atomic Charge, Bond Index, and ValenceThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2000
- Theoretical Studies of the Properties and Solution Chemistry of AnO22+ and AnO2+ Aquo Complexes for An = U, Np, and PuThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2000
- Numerical integration for polyatomic systemsJournal of Computational Physics, 1992