Case Definitions for Acute Coronary Heart Disease in Epidemiology and Clinical Research Studies
Top Cited Papers
- 18 November 2003
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 108 (20) , 2543-2549
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000100560.46946.ea
Abstract
An epidemic of coronary heart disease (CHD) began during the 20th century in most industrialized countries, where CHD is a leading cause of mortality among adults.1 Developing countries show the beginnings of the same epidemic. Reliable information on population incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality rates of CHD is essential to understanding, treating, and controlling the epidemic but is generally unavailable. Consistent and universal definitions of cases of CHD allow the determination of rates and comparisons within and between populations. These case definitions are essential to epidemiological studies and other research, such as clinical trials, quality assurance, and economic analysis of healthcare costs. The need for standardization is clear, and this statement recommends updated definitions. Definitions of cases for epidemiology studies and clinical trials in acute CHD rest on World Health Organization (WHO) (1959) and American Heart Association (1964) reports, followed by the WHO European AMI Registry criteria.2,3 Myocardial infarction (MI) is based on cardiac symptoms, ECG changes, and/or elevation in biomarkers. This basic system has been widely used but variably interpreted, resulting in a lack of comparability among and within studies. Further specification and working definitions of CHD come from the Framingham Study.4 The WHO criteria were revised in a joint report with the International Society and Federation of Cardiology in 1979.5 More recently, the WHO MONICA Study6 and other surveillance and intervention studies, such as the Lipid Research Clinics in the United States,7 have modified further the definition of CHD cases. These changes are usually based on a greater specification to the original WHO definition to allow for application in different settings. Advancing diagnostic technology, therapeutic interventions, and changing disease presentation in recent years forces a reevaluation of case definitions for acute CHD. New biomarkers, cardiac troponins, and creatine kinase (CK)-MB mass provide information …Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global Burden of Cardiovascular DiseasesCirculation, 2001
- Myocardial infarction redefined—A consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial InfarctionEuropean Heart Journal, 2000
- Value of Serial Troponin T Measures for Early and Late Risk Stratification in Patients With Acute Coronary SyndromesCirculation, 1998
- Cardiac-Specific Troponin I Levels to Predict the Risk of Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Cardiac Troponin T Levels for Risk Stratification in Acute Myocardial IschemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Prospective study of the role of cardiac troponin T in patients admitted with unstable anginaBMJ, 1996
- Possible Influence of the Prospective Payment System on the Assignment of Discharge Diagnoses for Coronary Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- The Prognostic Value of Serum Troponin T in Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- T. Duckett Jones Memorial Lecture. The Jones criteria and the challenges of clinimetrics.Circulation, 1982
- Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Report of the Joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organization task force on standardization of clinical nomenclature.Circulation, 1979