Current Thoughts on Crossover Designs
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Clinical Research Practices and Drug Regulatory Affairs
- Vol. 4 (2) , 127-142
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10601338609051233
Abstract
In this paper a historical perspective will be developed regarding the use by drug sponsors of crossover designs in clinical trials in reference to new drug application (NDA) submissions to FDA and FDA's concerns with these designs. From the standpoint of drug sponsors, drug researchers and FDA statistical reviewers the possible impact of a report by the former Biometric and Epidemiological Methodology Advisory Committee (BEMAC) of the FDA and of recommendations contained in 22 FDA clinical guidelines on the matter of crossover designs will be discussed. Additionally, current experience gained from the FDA's statistical evaluation of crossover designs will be briefly presented and some constructive suggestions will be made to guide drug sponsors and drug researchers regarding the use of crossover designs in clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three-Period Crossover Designs for Two TreatmentsPublished by JSTOR ,1984
- Optimal Crossover Designs in the Presence of Carryover EffectsPublished by JSTOR ,1983
- A Review of Cross-Over TrialsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1982
- Two-Treatment Crossover Designs for Estimating a Variety of EffectsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1981
- The Crossover Experiment for Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1980
- The two‐period cross‐over clinical trial.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1979
- Antianxiety Drugs and Human PerformanceArchives of General Psychiatry, 1973