The representation of contrast and other stimulus parameters by single neurons in area 17 of the cat
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology
- Vol. 401 (3) , 304-314
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00582601
Abstract
The responses of neurons in area 17 were tested as a function of various stimulus parameters. The thresholds of individual cortical neurons were at contrasts between 0.01 and 0.1 (increment of 0.5×10−1 cd/m−2 on a background of 3 cd/m−2), the dynamic ranges were 1.0–2.0 log units of increment, and all cells showed a response decrease at increments above a certain maximum (supersaturation response). The averaged contrast/response curve for all neurons was S-shaped in the logarithmic plot, had a dynamic range of 2.5 log units, reached its maximum at a contrast of 0.75 and supersaturated above this level. The contrast/ sensitivity curves changed their slope under different stimulus conditions. They became flatter when the non-dominant eye was stimuated as compared to dominant eye stimulation or when the stimulation was done at a non-optimal orientation or direction, and they became steeper when both eyes were stimulated. But the maximum was reached at the same contrast and supersaturation was seen above maximum contrast no matter whether a cell was stronlgy (e.g. binocular stimulation at optimal orientation) or weakly excited (non-dominant or non-optimal orientation stimulation). After normalization, the averaged population contrast/response curves were virtually identical at all stimulus conditions. It was concluded, that range as well as maximum and supersaturation of cortical contrast/response curves are determined before the input reaches the cortex, and that the cortical cells summate, essentially, linearly. The findings furthermore demonstrate that the supersaturation of the cortical input must be due to subtractive inhibition, and that the same is true for the orientation sensitive inhibition in the cortex itself. Both, the peripheral contrast and the cortical orientation dependant inhibition cannot be explained by multiplicative inhibition. The fact, that the responses of neurons depend on many variables relativates their significance for feature representation.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early post‐natal development of neuronal function in the kitten's visual cortex: a laminar analysis.The Journal of Physiology, 1984
- Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1982
- The relationship between response amplitude and contrast for cat striate cortical neurones.The Journal of Physiology, 1981
- Representation of complex visual stimuli in the brainThe Science of Nature, 1978
- A quantitative study of the projection area of the central and the paracentral visual field in area 17 of the catExperimental Brain Research, 1975
- Variability of the relative preference for stimulus orientation and direction of movement in some units of the cat visual cortex (areas 17 and 18).The Journal of Physiology, 1975
- The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratingsThe Journal of Physiology, 1968
- The distribution of the T‐system along the sarcomeres of frog and toad sartorius musclesThe Journal of Physiology, 1968
- Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and opticsThe Journal of Physiology, 1962
- Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortexThe Journal of Physiology, 1962