Electronic Screening of Dictated Reports to Identify Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Status
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 11 (5) , 403-409
- https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m1518
Abstract
Objective: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and advance directives are increasingly prevalent and may affect medical interventions and outcomes. Simple, automated techniques to identify patients with DNR orders do not currently exist but could help avoid costly and time-consuming chart review. This study hypothesized that a decision to withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation would be included in a patient's dictated reports. The authors developed and validated a simple computerized search method, which screens dictated reports to detect patients with DNR status. Methods: A list of concepts related to DNR order documentation was developed using emergency department, hospital admission, consult, and hospital discharge reports of 665 consecutive, hospitalized pneumonia patients during a four-year period (1995–1999). The list was validated in an independent group of 190 consecutive inpatients with pneumonia during a five-month period (1999–2000). The reference standard for the presence of DNR orders was manual chart review of all study patients. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and nonerror rates were calculated for individual and combined concepts. Results: The list of concepts included: DNR, Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate (DNAR), DNI, NCR, advanced directive, living will, power of attorney, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), defibrillation, arrest, resuscitate, code, and comfort care. As determined by manual chart review, a DNR order was written for 32.6% of patients in the derivation and for 31.6% in the validation group. Dictated reports included DNR order–related information for 74.5% of patients in the derivation and 73% in the validation group. If mentioned in the dictated report, the combined keyword search had a sensitivity of 74.2% in the derivation group (70.0% in the validation group), a specificity of 91.5% (81.5%), a positive predictive value of 80.9% (63.6%), a negative predictive value of 88.0% (85.5%), and a nonerror rate of 85.9% (77.9%). DNR and resuscitate were the most frequently used and power of attorney and advanced directives the least frequently used terms. Conclusion: Dictated hospital reports frequently contained DNR order–related information for patients with a written DNR order. Using an uncomplicated keyword search, electronic screening of dictated reports yielded good accuracy for identifying patients with DNR order information.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders after implementation of the patient self-determination actJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2003
- Community‐Acquired Pneumonia and Do Not Resuscitate OrdersJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2002
- Evaluation of a Computerized Diagnostic Decision Support System for Patients with Pneumonia: Study Design ConsiderationsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2001
- May I Take Your OrderQuality Management in Health Care, 1999
- Effectiveness of Computer-Generated Reminders for Increasing Discussions about Advance Directives and Completion of Advance Directive FormsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- The Unified Medical Language System: An Informatics Research CollaborationJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998
- Epidemiology of Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- Unlocking Clinical Data from Narrative Reports: A Study of Natural Language ProcessingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Orders Not to ResuscitateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- CLOSED-CHEST CARDIAC MASSAGEJAMA, 1960