Optimal timing for electrical defibrillation after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (7) , 2022-2028
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000070446.84095.f4
Abstract
It currently is recommended that electrical shocks be delivered immediately on recognition of ventricular fibrillation. However, decreased effectiveness of this approach has been reported after prolonged intervals of untreated ventricular fibrillation. We investigated the optimal strategy for successful defibrillation after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation by using a rat model of ventricular fibrillation and closed-chest resuscitation.Controlled, randomized, laboratory study.Research laboratory at a VA hospital.Seventy pentobarbital anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats.After 10 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, four groups of rats were randomized to receive electrical shocks (which we designated as "experimental shocks") immediately before or at 2, 4, or 6 mins of chest compression. Unsuccessfully defibrillated rats received additional shocks (which we designated as "rescue shocks") after 8 mins of chest compression.The number of rats that restored spontaneous circulation after the experimental shocks increased with increasing duration of the predefibrillatory interval of chest compression (0 of 8, 0 of 8, 2 of 8, and 7 of 8, respectively, p <.005). Two additional groups then were randomized to receive repetitive experimental shocks at 2, 4, and 6 mins or a single attempt at 6 mins of chest compression. Although a comparable number of rats restored spontaneous circulation in each group, rats subjected to repetitive defibrillation attempts had more intense postresuscitation ectopic activity and worse survival. Two final groups were used to investigate whether inhibition of the sarcolemmal sodium-hydrogen exchanger isoform-1 (NHE-1) could facilitate return of spontaneous circulation during repetitive defibrillation attempts. Although spontaneous circulation was restored earlier in more rats subjected to NHE-1 inhibition, the differences were statistically insignificant. NHE-1 inhibition, however, replicated previously reported resuscitation and postresuscitation benefits. The optimal predefibrillation interval of chest compression was approximately 6 mins, and this coincided with partial return of the amplitude and frequency characteristics of the ventricular fibrillation waveform to those present immediately after induction of ventricular fibrillation.Improved outcome after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation may result from strategies that provide chest compression before attempting defibrillation and avoid early and repetitive defibrillation attempts. The amplitude and frequency characteristics of the ventricular fibrillation waveform could help identify the optimal timing for attempting electrical defibrillation.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Myocardial Na+/H+ ExchangerDrugs, 2001
- Effects of repetitive electrical shocks on postresuscitation myocardial functionCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Myocardial effects of repeated electrical defibrillations in the isolated fibrillating rat heartCritical Care Medicine, 2000
- Na‐Ca Exchange and Ca Fluxes during Contraction and Relaxation in Mammalian Ventricular MuscleaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1996
- Survival after cardiac arrest outside hospital over a 12-year period in GothenburgResuscitation, 1994
- Intramyocardial hypercarbic acidosis during cardiac arrest and resuscitationCritical Care Medicine, 1993
- Physiologic measurement of the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal: Estimating the duration of ventricular fibrillationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Median frequency — a new parameter for predicting defibrillation success rateAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1991
- Metabolic evidence of inadequate coronary blood flow during closed-chest resuscitation in dogsCardiovascular Research, 1985
- Influence of time and therapy on ventricular defibrillation in dogsCritical Care Medicine, 1980