‘Nice work if you can get it’: An analysis of optimal set?aside
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Oxford Agrarian Studies
- Vol. 19 (1) , 61-69
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13600819108424036
Abstract
This paper presents a model of the optimal set‐aside decision of a risk averse producer which takes account of the trade‐off between the certain return to set‐aside land and the higher (in expectation) but more uncertain return to cropping. The model is applied to the case of European wheat production. The ratio of set‐aside premium to expected net revenue per hectare required for producers to find it optimal to set‐aside the qualifying proportion of land is shown to be both very close to unity and relatively insensitive to changes in key parameter values. By contrast, once attractive set‐aside premiums have been established, it is shown that the optimal set‐aside proportion of land is relatively sensitive to these values.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- PRICE‐SUPPORT EFFECTS ON EC PRODUCERSJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1991
- THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORLD PRICE INSTABILITY AND THE PRICES FARMERS RECEIVE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIESJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1990
- PRODUCER RISK, PRODUCT COMPLEMENTARITY AND PRODUCT DIVERSIFICATIONJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1990
- RELATIVE VARIABILITY IN WHEAT YIELDS ACROSS COUNTRIES AND OVER TIMEJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1990
- CONSERVATION THROUGH LAND DIVERSION: A SURVEY OF FARMERS‘ ATTITUDESJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- CROPLAND DIVERSION (SET‐ASIDE) IN THE US AND UKJournal of Agricultural Economics, 1988
- RISK ATTITUDES AMONGST AUSTRALIAN FARMERSAustralian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1980