Euthanasia — The Need for Procedural Safeguards
- 16 January 1992
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 326 (3) , 197-199
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199201163260311
Abstract
ACTIVE euthanasia is the deliberate termination of a patient's life in order to prevent further suffering. In ethical discussions this has been seen as different from the withholding of life-sustaining treatment or the administration of a drug, such as morphine, that may hasten death but that has another primary purpose.Over the years, a large body of literature has been published for and against active euthanasia.1 2 3 4 5 6 The discussion turns on the tension between the ethical imperative to alleviate suffering, particularly in terminally ill patients who make a conscious decision to end their lives, and the proscription against participation by physicians . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morals and Moralism in the Debate over Euthanasia and Assisted SuicideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Euthanasia — A CritiqueNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Moral intuition, good deaths and ordinary medical practitioners.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1990
- EUTHANASIA: A CONTEMPORARY MORAL QUANDARYThe Lancet, 1989
- Active euthanasia violates fundamental principlesJAMA, 1989
- Moral dilemma: To kill or allow to die?Death Studies, 1989
- The right to die: The euthanasia discussion in the NetherlandsJournal of Cancer Education, 1989
- EuthanasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988