Diagnosis of Meleney's synergistic gangrene

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
A retrospective and comparative study of 127 case reports of Meleney's postoperative progressive synergistic gangrene and of 62 examples of postoperative amoebic skin gangrene, showed that these two entities were clinically indistinguishable and that therefore a purely clinical diagnosis of Meleney's gangrene could not be made. Furthermore, a critical appraisal of the bacteriological data indicated that a certain diagnosis of Meleney's gangrene cannot be provided by the clinical bacteriologist. Finally, the histological features were entirely non-specific thus precluding a definitive diagnosis by the histopathologist. If Meleney's entity cannot be diagnosed its existence becomes debatable. The alternative diagnosis of cutaneous amoebiasis is advanced for consideration. Several of the outstanding features of Meleney's progressive gangrene, hitherto unexplained, are better understood if Entamoeba histolytica is accepted as the prime cause rather than bacteria.