Foraging Ecology of Bees in an Old Field
- 1 February 1983
- Vol. 64 (1) , 165-175
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1937338
Abstract
In an abandoned field near Ithaca, New York, bee species partitioned the available flower resources, primarily by foraging at different times of the season and by visiting different flower species. Honey bees (Apis mellifera) concentrated on different flower species than did native bees. In spring, most flowers bloomed along roadsides, in cultivated fields, or in forests. Many were clustered in spatial distribution and had short blooming times. Spring—flying native bees included many species adapted to forage on native flower species that bloom before the tree canopy closes. Apis mellifera, an introduced species, appeared to outcompete native bees at large clusters of attractive flower species such as apple and the crucifer Barbarea vulgaris. Blooming of introduced herbs increased in the field in early summer. This period of resource abundance was exploited primarily by primitively eusocial halictine bees. The multivoltine seasonal cycle of these bees allowed them to build populations over the season and to forage in large numbers in early and mid summer. Halictus ligatus was the most common early summer halictine. This species concentrated its foraging on different flowers than did other early summer bees, probably because of differences in innate flower preferences. A profuse bloom of native goldenrods in late summer was the seasonal peak of resource abundance. Honey bees partitioned goldenrod species with late summer native bees on the basis of flowering time. Native bees must complete their seasonal cycles and enter diapause before the killing frost. They therefore foraged on early—blooming goldenrod species such as Solidago juncea. In contrast, honey bees overwinter as active bees within their hives. They were most common on later—blooming goldenrods, where they collected much of the nectar required for overwintering. Competition among foraging bees was probably most important in the spring at this site. Partitioning of flower species and differences in seasonal flight times resulted primarily from differences in innate flower preferences, number of generations per season, and means of overwintering.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competitive Interactions Between Neotropical Pollinators and Africanized Honey BeesScience, 1978
- Resource Partitioning in Bumblebees: Experimental Studies of Foraging BehaviorEcology, 1978
- Flowering Ecology of Some Spring Woodland HerbsEcology, 1978
- Pollination Ecology of Vernal AngiospermsOikos, 1978
- Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plantsOecologia, 1977
- Resource Partitioning in Bumble Bees: The Role of Behavioral FactorsScience, 1977
- Resource Partitioning Among Some Eusocial Insects: BumblebeesEcology, 1976
- Contrasting Foraging Strategies and Coexistence of Two Bee Species on a Single ResourceEcology, 1975
- Some Interspecific Relations Between Japanese and European HoneybeesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1959
- Differences in the Flowers Visited by Four Species of Bumble-Bees and their CausesJournal of Animal Ecology, 1957