The International Committee of the Red Cross in Afghanistan: reasserting the neutrality of humanitarian action
Top Cited Papers
- 9 February 2011
- journal article
- humanitarian action
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Review of the Red Cross
- Vol. 93 (881) , 173-188
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1816383111000026
Abstract
Neutrality as a guiding principle of humanitarian action was roundly rejected by most actors in Afghanistan's latest conflict. One party to the conflict commandeered assistance and aid organizations into a counter-insurgency campaign, and the other rejected Western aid organizations as agents of an imperialist West. The murder in 2003 of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) water engineer Ricardo Munguia, because of what he symbolized, cast doubt on whether the ICRC could be perceived as neutral in this highly polarized context. Rather than abandon a neutral stance, however, as so many aid organizations did, the ICRC persevered and, through some innovative and sometimes risky initiatives, managed to show both sides the benefits of having a neutral intermediary in conflict. Today, the ICRC continues to expand its reach to Afghans in dire need of humanitarian assistance.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: