Computer‐assisted image analysis of sperm concentration in human semen before and after swim‐up separation: comparison with assessment by haemocytometer
Open Access
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Andrology
- Vol. 12 (5) , 339-345
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1989.tb01322.x
Abstract
Evaluation of male fertility is based predominantly on results from semen analysis and determination of the sperm concentration is one of the main parameters of the analysis. The availability of a fully automated videomicrographic digital image analyser would offer both an objective and rapid method for determination of the sperm concentration. In the present study the sperm concentration in 327 semen samples was determined by haemocytometer according to the World Health Organization guidelines, and also by a computer‐assisted digital image analyser system. Results were classified according to the routine procedure (haemocytometer) before statistical analyses. The computerized measurements caused a shift to the right in the frequency distribution of sperm concentration. Sperm concentrations were more often overestimated significantly (P < 0.001) by the computerized measurements in semen samples with concentrations up to 80.0 × 106/ml. This overestimation seemed to be caused by the presence of particles in seminal plasma that were recognized incorrectly as sperm by the computer program. The computerized digital image analyser gave an average sperm concentration of 2.2 ± 0.6 × 106/ml (mean ± SEM) in 17 azoospermic semen samples while the routine procedure did not detect the presence of sperm cells. After removing the seminal plasma by washing and centrifugation with culture medium, and using the swim‐up procedure to harvest motile sperm, the computerized measurements showed comparable results with the routine procedure for those sperm preparations (n= 44) with sperm concentrations >5.0 × 106/ml. In sperm preparations with concentrations < 5.0 × 106/ml (n= 75) there was still a significant (P < 0.001) overestimation of the sperm concentration. These findings indicate that the CellSoft computer program has to be improved to allow correction for the particles present in seminal plasma which are not sperm. For determination of the sperm concentration in seminal plasma‐free preparations, an effective method to remove these particles is also necessary to obtain reliable results with the present computer‐assisted digital image analyser system.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the CellSoft automated semen analysis system in a routine laboratory settingFertility and Sterility, 1988
- An increase in in vitro fertilization ability of low-density human sperm capacitated by multiple-tube swim-up**Presented in part at the Third World Conference on Infectious Diseases and Human Infertility, March 21 to 22, 1980, New York.††Supported in part by Grant RR-01032 from the General Clinical Research Centers Program of the Division of Research Resources, National Institute of Health.Fertility and Sterility, 1987
- Comparison between a swim‐up and a Percoll gradient technique for the separation of human spermatozoaInternational Journal of Andrology, 1987
- Computerized semen analysis: objective measurement of semen characteristics is biased by subjective parameter settingFertility and Sterility, 1987
- Automatic Analysis of Human Sperm MotionJournal of Andrology, 1987
- Purification of human sperm by a discontinuous Percoll density gradient with an innercolumnBiology of Reproduction, 1986
- The use of Percoll gradients for the preparation of subpopulations of human spermatozoaInternational Journal of Andrology, 1983
- Isolation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation in Percoll®Gamete Research, 1983
- Effect of delayed insemination on in-vitro fertilization, culture and transfer of human embryosReproduction, 1982