Representing Social Action
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Discourse & Society
- Vol. 6 (1) , 81-106
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006001005
Abstract
The paper presents a framework for describing the representation of social action in English discourse, attempting to relate sociologically relevant categories of action to their grammatical and rhetorical realization in discourse. Departing from Halliday's theory of transitivity, it begins by describing 15 types of action and their typical grammatical realizations. It then describes the transformations which social actions can undergo in discourse—transformations such as objectivation, deagentialization, generalization, abstraction and overdetermination. The utility of the framework for critical discourse analysis is demonstrated through the analysis of an Australian newspaper feature critiquing the Australian Government's open door policy towards immigration from developing countries in a way which, the paper argues, is strongly tinged with racist attitudes.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Language and ControlPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2018
- Discourse in social changePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2013
- Language and PowerPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2013
- Metaphors We Live ByPublished by University of Chicago Press ,2003
- Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A SynopsisDiscourse & Society, 1993
- Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysisJournal of Pragmatics, 1985
- Notes on transitivity and theme in English Part IJournal of Linguistics, 1967