Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis: Lessons from long‐term followup of patients in the Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 8 December 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 50 (12) , 3934-3940
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20666
Abstract
Objective In the Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial (ELNT), 90 patients with lupus nephritis were randomly assigned to a high‐dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV CYC) regimen (6 monthly pulses and 2 quarterly pulses with escalating doses) or a low‐dose IV CYC regimen (6 pulses of 500 mg given at intervals of 2 weeks), each of which was followed by azathioprine (AZA). After a median followup of 41 months, a difference in efficacy between the 2 regimens was not observed. The present analysis was undertaken to extend the followup and to identify prognostic factors. Methods Renal function was prospectively assessed quarterly in all 90 patients except 5 who were lost to followup. Survival curves were derived using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Results After a median followup of 73 months, there was no significant difference in the cumulative probability of end‐stage renal disease or doubling of the serum creatinine level in patients who received the low‐dose IV CYC regimen versus those who received the high‐dose regimen. At long‐term followup, 18 patients (8 receiving low‐dose and 10 receiving high‐dose treatment) had developed permanent renal impairment and were classified as having poor long‐term renal outcome. We demonstrated by multivariate analysis that early response to therapy at 6 months (defined as a decrease in serum creatinine level and proteinuria <1 gm/24 hours) was the best predictor of good long‐term renal outcome. Conclusion Long‐term followup of patients from the ELNT confirms that, in lupus nephritis, a remission‐inducing regimen of low‐dose IV CYC followed by AZA achieves clinical results comparable with those obtained with a high‐dose regimen. Early response to therapy is predictive of good long‐term renal outcome.Keywords
Funding Information
- European League Against Rheumatism
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sequential Therapies for Proliferative Lupus NephritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Maintenance Therapy for Lupus Nephritis — Something Old, Something NewNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: The Euro‐Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low‐dose versus high‐dose intravenous cyclophosphamideArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Combination Therapy with Pulse Cyclophosphamide plus Pulse Methylprednisolone Improves Long-Term Renal Outcome without Adding Toxicity in Patients with Lupus NephritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials?BMJ, 1998
- Methylprednisolone and Cyclophosphamide, Alone or in Combination, in Patients with Lupus NephritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Controlled trial of pulse methylprednisolone versus two regimens of pulse cyclophosphamide in severe lupus nephritisThe Lancet, 1992
- Lupus Nephritis: Prognostic Factors and Probability of Maintaining Life-Supporting Renal Function 10 Years After the DiagnosisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1992
- Therapy of Lupus NephritisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosusArthritis & Rheumatism, 1982