Punishment and the Individual in the United States and Japan
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law & Society Review
- Vol. 22 (2) , 301-328
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3053438
Abstract
In this paper we argue that differences in the conceptualization of individual actors in networks provide the most parsimonious explanation for differences that occurbetweenAmerican and Japanese views of sanctions and between actors in different role relationshipswithineach society. Our empirical tests drew on respondents' hypothetical punishment choices and punishment rationales in surveys of Detroit, Michigan, and Yokohama and Kanazawa, Japan. As predicted, American views of punishments for everyday misdeeds were more likely to favor isolation or retribution and American rationales for imprisonment were significantly more retributive than in Japan. Within each culture, offenses between intimates were least likely to evoke isolative or retributive punishments whereas offenses between strangers were most likely to do so. We conclude by considering alternatives to our structuralist explanation of these findings and by suggesting some implications of legal culture for dispute resolution in the United States versus Japan.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Invitation to Law and Social SciencePublished by University of Pennsylvania Press ,1986
- Conflict in JapanPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1984
- Toward a Structural Theory of ActionPublished by Elsevier ,1982
- The art of Japanese managementBusiness Horizons, 1981
- Work, Mobility, and ParticipationPublished by University of California Press ,1979
- Japanese Patterns of BehaviorPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1976
- Public Opinion and the Death PenaltyStanford Law Review, 1974
- Chains of OpportunityPublished by Harvard University Press ,1970