Growth, food intake and energy balance of layer and broiler chickens offered glucose in the drinking water and the effect of dietary protein content

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. Four experiments were carried out to study the effect of offering a 91.5 g/1 solution of glucose, compared to tap water, on fluid intake, food intake and growth of individually‐caged immature chickens of both layer and broiler strains. 2. Male chicks of an egg‐laying strain were offered glucose solution or tap water from 27 to 62 d after hatching. There was no effect of glucose on fluid intake but it depressed food intake (P(P<0.001) and carcase fat content increased (P< 0.001) by the glucose to yield no difference to total carcase energy. 3. When birds were placed in a respiration chamber for two 23‐h periods there was no effect of treatment on outputs of energy as faeces + urine or as heat. 4. Male broilers were offered glucose solution or tap water with diets containing either 150 or 195 g protein/kg from 20 to 55 d after hatching. With the low‐protein diet glucose depressed food intake (P<0.01) but total energy intake and carcase energy were not significantly affected. With the high‐protein diet glucose did not depress food intake but increased total energy intake and total body fat. 5. Layer and broiler chicks were offered either a choice of the low‐and high‐protein diets or a single diet intermediate in protein content, with glucose solution or tap water. With broilers total food intake was depressed by glucose, mainly by a reduced intake of the low‐protein diet. Intake of neither diet by the layer chicks was significantly affected by glucose. 6. It is concluded that provision of extra energy in glucose solution depresses food intake when the resultant energy: protein ratio becomes limiting. With a higher protein diet, or with birds having lower protein requirements, glucose solution does not depress food intake and increased fat deposition occurs.