A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers: Part II. Applications
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 30 (5) , 459-472
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02189063
Abstract
The authors describe uses for a 17-item instrument that efficiently measures the functioning level of chronically mentally ill persons living in the community. The Multnomah Community Ability Scale is designed to be completed by case managers who work with chronically mentally ill consumers. The instrument is sensitive to differences among individuals within this special population of consumers and is easy to complete. Community mental health program staff can be trained to use the scale reliably. The scale has been used to compare levels of severity between urban and rural community mental health program clients. The authors discuss the application of the Multnomah Community Ability Scale to a capitated payment system for severely mentally ill, involuntary clients.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A community ability scale for chronically mentally Ill consumers: Part I. Reliability and validityCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1994
- An Examination of the Relationships among Three Outcome Scales in SchizophreniaJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1992
- Summated Rating Scale ConstructionPublished by SAGE Publications ,1992
- Health plan case mix: definition, measurement, and use.1991
- The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situationsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1990
- Disease, illness, sickness; impairment, disability and handicapPsychological Medicine, 1990
- Psychiatric Severity of IllnessMedical Care, 1989
- Assessment schedules for chronic psychiatric patientsPsychological Medicine, 1987
- Selecting a rating scale for evaluating services to the chronically mentally IllCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1987
- Do therapists bias their ratings of patient functioning under peer review?Community Mental Health Journal, 1986