The Micellar Hypothesis of Fat Absorption: Must It Be Revisited?
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 20 (4) , 389-394
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528509089669
Abstract
In 1962, Hofman & BorgstroUm (1, 2) applied the then available knowledge of detergent chemistry to the problem of the physicochemical status of intestinal content during digestion of fat. In vitro studies indicated that the products of pancreatic lipolysis of triglyceride fat–mainly 2-mono-glyceride and fatty acid–form mixed micelles with bile salts in an isotropic (optically clear) solution. Ultracentrifugation of intestinal content after a fatty meal fed to man yielded an oil phase and a clear aqueous phase. The former contained mostly unchanged triglyceride and some diglyceride, the latter mainly fatty acid and mono-glyceride. It was concluded that intestinal content during digestion is a detergent solution above its critical micellar concentration (CMC). The results were consistent with the hypothesis that intestinal lipids, during fat digestion, are partitioned between a micellar and an oil phase and that absorption of dietary lipid takes place from a micellar solution containing chiefly fatty acid and 2-monoglyceride (2). Evidence for the last part of this series of events, the uptake of micellar lipid by the enterocyte, was later obtained by in vitro studies using intestinal sacs and brush border preparations (3). In these experiments micellar monoolein and oleic acid were taken up in parallel. It was later shown, both in vitro and in vivo (4, 5), that components other than monoolein/ oleic acid in micellar solution are taken up to a different extent and at different rates, suggesting that micellar lipids are not absorbed as intact aggregates. The results of studies by Simmonds (6) and Westergaard & Dietschy (7) indicated that lipids in general were taken up by diffusion of a monomolecular dispersion of lipids in the aqueous phase rather than through direct transfer of lipid molecules from the mixed micelles to the brush border membrane of the mucosal epithelial cell and that the importance of the mixed lipid– bile salt micelle was to ‘increase the pressure-head for diffusion’ (6) or to ‘overcome the resistance of the unstirred water-layer adjacent to the enterocyte membrane’ (7). For references, see the comprehensive review by Thomson & Dietschy (8).Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of intrajejunal acidity on lipid digestion and aqueous solubilisation of bile acids and lipids in health, using a new simple method of lipase inactivation.Gut, 1984
- Aqueous lipid phases of relevance to intestinal fat digestion and absorptionLipids, 1981
- An x-ray scattering study of the L2-phase in monoglyceride-water systemJournal of Colloid and Interface Science, 1979
- Watching Fat DigestionScience, 1979
- The mechanism whereby bile acid micelles increase the rate of fatty acid and cholesterol uptake into the intestinal mucosal cell.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1976
- Isolation and properties of the mixed lipid micelles present in intestinal content during fat digestion in man.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1975
- The intermicellar bile salt concentration in equilibrium with the mixed-micelles of human bileBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Lipids and Lipid Metabolism, 1975
- THE ROLE OF MICELLAR SOLUBILIZATION IN LIPID ABSORPTIONImmunology & Cell Biology, 1972
- Absorption of Cholesterol from a Micellar Solution: Intestinal Perfusion Studies in Man*Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1967
- The Intraluminal Phase of Fat Digestion in Man: The Lipid Content of the Micellar and Oil Phases of Intestinal Content Obtained during Fat Digestion and Absorption*Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1964