In vitro activities of three semisynthetic amide derivatives of teicoplanin, MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873
Open Access
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 36 (2) , 331-338
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.36.2.331
Abstract
MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873 are three semisynthetic amide derivatives of teicoplanin (MDL 62208 is an amide of teicoplanin aglycone, MDL 62211 is an amide of the teicoplanin A2 complex, and MDL 62873 is the corresponding derivative of peak A2-2 of the complex). The three semisynthetic glycopeptides were evaluated for in vitro antibacterial activity in comparison with the parent drug (teicoplanin) and vancomycin. A variety of gram-positive bacteria of clinical origin, whose species were carefully determined and that included 428 staphylococci (207 methicillin susceptible and 221 methicillin resistant), 41 streptococci, 82 enterococci, 43 strains of Listeria monocytogenes, 10 JK coryneform bacteria, and 67 anaerobes belonging to the genera Clostridium, Propionibacterium, Peptostreptococcus, and Eubacterium, were tested. The only resistances to MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873 were encountered with vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant enterococci. All of the other test strains, including some teicoplanin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci of the species Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, were highly susceptible to the three teicoplanin amides. Only minor differences in activity were observed among MDL 62208, MDL 62211, and MDL 62873, whereas the three experimental compounds were usually found to be more potent than teicoplanin or vancomycin (especially against staphylococci, with differences mostly ranging from 2- to 16-fold). The MBC-to-MIC ratios varied depending on the organisms, with the highest ratios usually observed for enterococci and listeriae. Overall, the MBC-to-MIC ratios yielded by the teicoplanin analogs were slightly greater than those yielded by teicoplanin or vancomycin.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- In-vitro activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, ramoplanin, MDL 62873 and other agents against staphylococi, enterococci and Clostridium difficileJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1990
- Enterococcal resistance to vancomycin and related cyclic glycopeptide antibioticsEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Synthesis and biological properties of N63-carboxamides of teicoplanin antibiotics. Structure-activity relationshipsJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1989
- Teicoplanin revisitedJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1988
- Plasmid-Mediated Resistance to Vancomycin and Teicoplanin in Enterococcus FaeciumNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Emergence of Vancomycin Resistance in Coagulase-Negative StaphylococciNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- TEICOPLANIN-RESISTANT COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCIThe Lancet, 1987
- TEICOPLANIN-RESISTANT COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUSThe Lancet, 1986
- Anti-Staphylococcal Activity of Teicoplanin, Vancomycin, and Other Antimicrobial Agents: The Significance of Methicillin ResistanceThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1986
- Teicoplanin, its pharmacokinetics, blister and peritoneal fluid penetrationJournal of Hospital Infection, 1986