Understanding Nonresponders of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Current and Future Perspectives
- 7 July 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 16 (10) , 1117-1124
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.40829.x
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is now an established nonpharmacologic therapy for advanced heart failure with electromechanical delay. Despite compelling evidence of the benefits of CRT, one troubling issue is the lack of a favorable response in about one‐third of patients. Methods and Results: Currently, there is no unifying definition of responders, and published data were based on acute hemodynamic changes, chronic left ventricular reverse remodeling, as well as the intermediate or long‐term clinical response. The lack of improvement with CRT can be due to many factors including the placement of the left ventricular pacing lead in an inappropriate location, the absence of electrical conduction delay or mechanical dyssynchrony despite wide QRS complexes, and possibly failure to optimize the CRT settings after device implantation. In acute hemodynamic studies, placing the left ventricular leads at the free wall region has been suggested to generate the best pulse pressure and positive dp/dt. The degree of mechanical dyssynchrony has recently been assessed noninvasively in CRT patients by echocardiography and in particular by tissue Doppler imaging. These studies suggested that responders of left ventricular reverse remodeling or systolic function had more severe systolic dyssynchrony. However, further studies are needed to examine the clinical utility of these parameters when applied to the standardized anatomic or functional endpoints. Optimization of atrioventricular and interventricular pacing intervals may also reduce the number of nonresponders, though newer methods, especially interventricular pacing intervals, are still under clinical investigation. Conclusion: With the adjunctive use of imaging technology, physicians are able to characterize the response to CRT objectively, and cardiac imaging is an important clinical tool for determining more precisely the presence and degree of mechanical dyssynchrony.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Usefulness of the peak velocity difference by tissue Doppler imaging technique as an effective predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Tissue Doppler Imaging Is Superior to Strain Rate Imaging and Postsystolic Shortening on the Prediction of Reverse Remodeling in Both Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure After Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCirculation, 2004
- Epicardial left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy: optimal pace site selection with pressure-volume loopsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Usefulness of echocardiographic tissue synchronization imaging to predict acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Beyond the measurement of QRS complex toward mechanical dyssynchrony: cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure patients with a normal QRS durationHeart, 2004
- Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Current State of the ArtCirculation, 2004
- Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Size and Function in Chronic Heart FailureCirculation, 2003
- ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary ArticleCirculation, 2002
- The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure (PATH-CHF) study: rationale, design, and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study11For a complete list of institutions and individuals participating in the PATH-CHF Study Group, see the Appendix.The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- TiN: A Suitable Coating for Defibrillator Electrodes?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1995