A Comparison of Post-Operative Mobilization of Flexor Tendon Repairs with “Passive Flexion–Active Extension” and “Controlled Active Motion” Techniques
- 1 August 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
- Vol. 19 (4) , 517-521
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(94)90219-4
Abstract
We report a comparative study of the outcome of flexor tendon repairs mobilized by either a “passive flexion-active extension” or a “controlled active motion” regimen. We show that the controlled active motion regimen conferred significant benefits on the final range of motion and extensor lag. The rupture rate was raised with “controlled active motion” but this was not greater than levels reported by other authors using “passive flexion-active extension” regimens.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by controlled active mobilisationJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1989
- A review of repaired flexor tendonsJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1987
- A Combined Regimen of Controlled Motion Following Flexor Tendon Repair in “No Manʼs Land”Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1987
- Ruptured flexor tendon tenorrhaphies in zone II: Repair and rehabilitationThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1987
- Methods of Evaluation of the Functional Results of Flexor Tendon Repair of the FingersJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1985
- Report of the Committee on Tendon InjuriesThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1983
- The primary repair of digital flexor tendonsBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1982
- Primary Repair Of Flexor Tendons In The Hand Without Immobilisation – Preliminary ReportThe Hand, 1978
- Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilizationThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1977
- Primary Repair without Immobilization of Flexor Tendon Division within the Digital Sheath: An Experimental and Clinical StudyActa Orthopaedica, 1969