Relation between hostility and coronary heart disease
- 2 October 1999
- Vol. 319 (7214) , 917
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7214.917
Abstract
# Evidence does not support link {#article-title-2} EDITOR—The summary points of Hemingway and Marmot's review of psychosocial risk factors for coronary heart disease may be misleading.1 The first of these states that “prospective cohort studies show a possible aetiological role for type A/hostility.” However, of the four prospective studies of hostility, only two show any significant association between hostility and coronary heart disease (one for women only). Six of the nine aetiological studies of type A behaviour also show no association with coronary heart disease. The other three studies give no information on completeness of follow up or whether outcomes such as angina were assessed in a blinded manner. One of these studies had minimal adjustment for confounding. No study showed any prognostic role for type A behaviour or hostility. Taken together, these studies do not represent robust evidence that these psychological variables have an important role in the development or prognosis of coronary …Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence based cardiology: Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systematic review of prospective cohort studiesBMJ, 1999
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- Hostility and the heartBMJ, 1997
- A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health.Psychological Bulletin, 1996
- Hostility during Late Adolescence Predicts Coronary Risk Factors at Mid-LifeAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992