Comparison of high‐dose melphalan with a more intensive regimen of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide for patients with multiple myeloma
- 2 June 2004
- Vol. 100 (12) , 2607-2612
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20294
Abstract
BACKGROUND High‐dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as part of the initial treatment regimen improves progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with multiple myeloma. The optimal preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma has yet to be defined. In the current study, the authors compared the outcomes associated with high‐dose melphalan (HDM) and a more intensive regimen of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide (TBC) in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS One hundred eighty‐six patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (median age, 51 years) received HDC with ASCT for consolidation of first remission (n = 108) or for treatment of primary refractory disease (n = 78). Seventy patients had a large tumor mass at the time of diagnosis. The preparative regimen consisted of TBC for 97 patients and HDM for 89 patients. Patients in the TBC group were younger and had more advanced disease stage at diagnosis and at the time of ASCT compared with patients in the HDM group. RESULTS The response rates (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) were similar in the TBC group (overall response rate, 66%; CR rate, 17%; PR rate, 49%) and the HDM group (overall response rate, 69%; CR rate, 28%; PR rate, 41%). PFS and OS were similar in both groups. A proportional hazards regression model revealed that Durie–Salmon disease stage at diagnosis and having received three or more previous treatment regimens were the only factors that predicted PFS; the type of preparative regimen did not influence outcome. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study indicate that the use of a more intensive regimen did not improve results compared with HDM in patients with multiple myeloma. HDM should continue to be considered the standard preparative regimen for patients with myeloma. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma who received dexamethasone-based nonmyelosuppressive induction therapyBone Marrow Transplantation, 2004
- The role of stem cell transplantation in multiple myelomaBlood Reviews, 2002
- Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trialBlood, 2002
- Impact of complete remission with intensive therapy in patients with responsive multiple myelomaBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- High-dose therapy and innovative approaches to treatment of multiple myelomaSeminars in Hematology, 2001
- Thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide (TBC) and autologous hematopoietic transplantation: an intensive regimen for the treatment of multiple myelomaBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- Multiple Myeloma: New Insights and Therapeutic ApproachesHematology-American Society Hematology Education Program, 2000
- CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DISEASE RESPONSE AND PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED BY HIGH‐DOSE THERAPY AND HAEMOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATIONBritish Journal of Haematology, 1998
- A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation and Chemotherapy in Multiple MyelomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Prognostic factors in multiple myelomaCancer, 1975