Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 14 (3) , 137-158
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137
Abstract
I assume multiple types of players--“rational egoists,” as well as “conditional cooperators” and “willing punishers”--in models of nonmarket behavior. I use an indirect evolutionary approach to explain how multiple types of players could survive and flourish in social dilemma situations. Contextual variables that enhance knowledge about past behavior assist in explaining the origin of collective action. Among the important contextual variables are types of goods, types of groups, and rules that groups use to provide and allocate goods. Finally, I reexamine a series of design principles that were derived earlier from an examination of extensive case materials.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of Price Policy in the Presence of Water TheftAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999
- Creating and enforcing norms, with special reference to sanctionsInternational Review of Law and Economics, 1999
- A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and CooperationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- THE INDIRECT EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH:Rationality and Society, 1998
- Judgment Accuracy of Other's Trustworthiness and General Trust: An Experimental StudyTHE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997
- Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old childrenMemory & Cognition, 1996
- An evolutionary approach to explaining cooperative behavior by reciprocal incentivesInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1995
- A Grammar of InstitutionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- How Intrinsic Motivation is Crowded out and inRationality and Society, 1994
- THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONS IN THE REVIVAL OF TRADE: THE LAW MERCHANT, PRIVATE JUDGES, AND THE CHAMPAGNE FAIRSEconomics & Politics, 1990