Medical practice guidelines: lessons from the United States.
- 31 July 1993
- Vol. 307 (6899) , 313-317
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6899.313
Abstract
Clinical guidelines, or protocols, have been devised by many different groups, often with differing aims. Some aim to reduce variations in care by using guidelines, while others seek to improve outcomes. Guidelines have long been used in the United States to try to control the behaviour of the medical profession--and the cost of health care. The "effectiveness initiative," run by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research spawned much activity among other groups, including the American Medical Association and the American College of Physicians. The experience of the Americans in analysing data to gauge effectiveness and then in disseminating good practice may help British moves in this direction. In particular, it is often hard to get guidelines adopted in practice; doctors have to be exposed to the same message in different forms. Also guidelines must not be unrealistic: those devised by senior doctors away from the realities of day to day practice are likely to fail.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Glue ear guidelines: time to act on the evidenceThe Lancet, 1992
- Using guidelinesBMJ, 1992
- Recognition and management of depression in general practice: consensus statement.BMJ, 1992
- Guidance on guidelinesBMJ, 1992
- Quality management in the NHS: the doctor's role--I.BMJ, 1992
- The Legislative Battle Over Health Services ResearchHealth Affairs, 1992
- Political Evolution of Federal Health Care RegulationHealth Affairs, 1992
- Algorithm based improvement of clinical quality.BMJ, 1990
- Mass screening: theory and ethics.BMJ, 1990
- Effectiveness in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988