Evacuation behaviour: why do some evacuate, while others do not? A case study of the Ephrata, Pennsylvania (USA) evacuation
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal
- Vol. 4 (4) , 30-36
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09653569510093414
Abstract
Evacuation is commonly used to mitigate the ill effects of a variety of disaster agents. It is important that authorities gain an accurate understanding of the circumstances under which citizens will evacuate. Tests the efficacy of evacuation message clarity and frequency, authority type, the accuracy of past warnings, and the impact of the presence of children in the home as viable variables in effecting an evacuation response. Finds the evacuation response was more likely to occur if the potential victim was ordered to do so, if the potential victim was contacted frequently (more than once) by the proper authority (as perceived by the potential victim), if past warnings were perceived as being accurate, and dependent children were in the home. Interviews respondents from 83 households in Ephrata, Pennsylvania, USA, after a major fire emergency threatened residents of three neighbourhoods contiguous to the site.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human System Responses to DisasterPublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- Evacuation Planning in Emergency ManagementGeographical Review, 1983
- CRISIS COMMUNICATIONS: ETHNIC DIFFERENTIALS IN INTERPRETING AND ACTING ON DISASTER WARNINGSSocial Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1982
- Emergency Decision Making: A Theoretical Analysis of Responses to Disaster WarningsJournal of Human Stress, 1977
- Disaster Warning and Communication Processes in Two CommunitiesJournal of Communication, 1969
- Social Processes in Disaster: Family EvacuationSocial Problems, 1969
- Families in Disaster: Reactions and RelativesJournal of Marriage and Family, 1968
- Before the Wind: A Study of the Response to Hurricane Carla.Social Forces, 1964
- II: Disasters Compared in Six American CommunitiesHuman Organization, 1957
- VII: Some General Propositions: An Interpretative SummaryHuman Organization, 1957