Equivalency of various methods for estimating osteoid seam width
Open Access
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 4 (5) , 671-677
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650040505
Abstract
We compared the true osteoid seam width (TOSW) as measured by a modification of the orthogonal intercept lengths with various methods of estimating seam widths, including (1) the commonly used length measurements at four equidistant points (O.Wi/4PT), (2) osteoid area divided by the osteoid perimeter (O.Ar/O/Pm) or the bone/osteoid interface (O.Ar/B.Bd), and (3) a novel method for estimating seam width defined as the osteoid area divided by the major axis of the seam (O.Ar/Axis). All methods for approximating osteoid seam width significantly exaggerated the true osteoid seam dimension by an amount that ranged from 16 to 23%. However, the relative accuracy of all methods of estimating osteoid seam width are equivalent as evidenced by the similar mean difference from the TOSW (3.4, 4.1, 5.1, and 3.8) demonstrated by O.Wi/5PT, O.Ar/Axis, O.Ar/O.Pm, O.Ar/B.Bd, respectively. Regression analysis of the various estimates of seam width on TOSW also demonstrated the equivalency of these methods. Moreover, all estimates could be employed to discriminate seams of normal dimensions from abnormally wide seams in bone specimens derived from patients with osteomalacia. Differences between the methods, however, were observed that may have practical importance. In this regard, the direct procedure of determining distance demonstrated less variance than the indirect estimate of width. As a result, the direct measurement required fewer samples (n = 13) to detect a significant difference to normal and could discriminate smaller deviations in seam width (1.7 μm) at a given sample size compared with O.Ar/Axis (n = 28; 2.9 μm), O.Ar/O.Pm (n = 42; 3.4 μm), and O.Ar/B.Bd (n = 42; n = 3.2). However, in spite of the differences in the various methods, all width estimates can be successfully employed to discriminate small changes in seam widths provided that adequate numbers of seams are evaluated and mean values compared.Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health ((I-ROI-AR36903))
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committeeJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1987
- Normal and Pathological Remodeling of Human Trabecular Bone: Three Dimensional Reconstruction of the Remodeling Sequence in Normals and in Metabolic Bone Disease*Endocrine Reviews, 1986
- Aluminum deposition at the osteoid-bone interface. An epiphenomenon of the osteomalacic state in vitamin D-deficient dogs.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1985
- Direct and indirect measurements of osteoid seam width in human iliac crest trabecular boneMetabolic Bone Disease and Related Research, 1984
- A new semiautomatic method for quantitative static and dynamic bone histologyCalcified Tissue International, 1982
- Estimation of the three-dimensional wall thickness of completed remodeling sites in iliac trabecular boneMetabolic Bone Disease and Related Research, 1982
- Determination of membrane thickness distribution from orthogonal interceptsJournal of Microscopy, 1979