Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Motivation: Microarrays datasets frequently contain a large number of missing values (MVs), which need to be estimated and replaced for subsequent data mining. The focus of the paper is to study the effects of different MV treatments for cDNA microarray data on disease classification analysis. Results: By analyzing five datasets, we demonstrate that among three kinds of classifiers evaluated in this study, support vector machine (SVM) classifiers are robust to varied MV imputation methods [e.g. replacing MVs by zero, K nearest-neighbor (KNN) imputation algorithm, local least square imputation and Bayesian principal component analysis], while the classification and regression tree classifiers are sensitive in terms of classification accuracy. The KNNclassifiers built on differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are robust to the varied MV treatments, but the performances of the KNN classifiers based on all measured genes can be significantly deteriorated when imputing MVs for genes with larger missing rate (MR) (e.g. MR > 5%). Generally, while replacing MVs by zero performs relatively poor, the other imputation algorithms have little difference in affecting classification performances of the SVM or KNN classifiers. We further demonstrate the power and feasibility of our recently proposed functional expression profile (FEP) approach as means to handle microarray data with MVs. The FEPs, which are derived from the functional modules that are enriched with sets of DEGs and thus can be consistently identified under varied MV treatments, achieve precise disease classification with better biological interpretation. We conclude that the choice of MV treatments should be determined in context of the later approaches used for disease classification. The suggested exclusion criterion of ignoring the genes with larger MR (e.g. >5%), while justifiable for some classifiers such as KNN classifiers, might not be considered as a general rule for all classifiers. Contact:guoz@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn; yangbf@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.