Predictive markers in breast cancer – the present
- 13 December 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
- Vol. 52 (1) , 82-90
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02897.x
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and there is a continual drive to identify markers that will aid in predicting prognosis and response to therapy. To date, relatively few markers have established prognostic power. Oestrogen receptor (ER) is probably the most powerful predictive marker in breast cancer management, both in determining prognosis and in predicting response to hormone therapies. Progesterone receptor (PR) is also a widely used marker, although its value is less well established. HER-2 status has also become a routine prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer. Given the importance of these biological markers in patient management, it is essential that assays are robust and quality controlled, and that interpretation is standardized. Furthermore, it is important to be aware of the limitations in their predictive power, and how this may be refined through addition of further biological markers. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the established role of ER, PR and HER-2 in patient management, the current standards for assessing these markers, as well as highlighting the controversies that still surround their use and methods of assessment.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selecting Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: What Role Does HER-2/neu Status Play?Seminars in Oncology, 2006
- HER2and Responsiveness of Breast Cancer to Adjuvant ChemotherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancerBMJ, 2005
- HER-2/neu Gene Amplification and Response to Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Breast CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data setsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Correlation between immunohistochemistry (HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER‐2 in 426 breast carcinomas from 37 centresThe Journal of Pathology, 2003
- Immunohistochemical detection of steroid receptors in breast cancer: a working protocolJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Agonistic Effect of Tamoxifen Is Dependent on Cell Type, ERE-Promoter Context, and Estrogen Receptor Subtype: Functional Difference between Estrogen Receptors α and βBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1997
- Hormone Receptors as Prognostic Factors in Female: Breast CancerAnnals of Medicine, 1991
- Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of Relapse and Survival with Amplification of the HER-2/ neu OncogeneScience, 1987