Incremental net benefit in randomized clinical trials
- 29 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (11) , 1563-1574
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.789
Abstract
There are three approaches to health economic evaluation for comparing two therapies. These are (i) cost minimization, in which one assumes or observes no difference in effectiveness, (ii) incremental cost-effectiveness, and (iii) incremental net benefit. The latter can be expressed either in units of effectiveness or costs. When analysing data from a clinical trial, expressing incremental net benefit in units of cost allows the investigator to examine all three approaches in a single graph, complete with the corresponding statistical inferences. Furthermore, if costs and effectiveness are not censored, this can be achieved using common two-sample statistical procedures. The above will be illustrated using two examples, one with censoring and one without. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Net Health BenefitsMedical Decision Making, 1998
- The Interpretation of results of economic evaluation: explicating the value of healthHealth Economics, 1997
- Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: A non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimationHealth Economics, 1997
- Confidence Intervals for Cost-Effectiveness Ratios: A Comparison of Four MethodsHealth Economics, 1997
- ESTIMATING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS: AN EXAMPLE FROM A RANDOMIZED TRIALStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: An application of Fieller's theoremHealth Economics, 1996
- Confidence intervals for cost/effectiveness ratiosHealth Economics, 1995
- Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios alongside a clinical trialHealth Economics, 1994
- In Search of Power and Significance: Issues in the Design and Analysis of Stochastic Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Health CareMedical Care, 1994
- On the (Near) Equivalence of Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit AnalysesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991