Improving Housing by Conventional Versus Self-help Methods: Evidence From Israel
- 1 August 1987
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Studies
- Vol. 24 (4) , 324-332
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00420988720080491
Abstract
The study compares the two major processes of improving housing conditions for moderate- and low-income households in Israel: the institutional solution - relocating eligible households in new public housing; and the spontaneous self-help solution - households who purchase their housing units from a housing management company, improve and enlarge them on their own initiative and with their own resources, with or without the assistance of a publicly subsidised loan. It was found that the self-help improvements produced better housing conditions, better relationships with neighbours and more satisfaction with housing. They increased the individual motivation to work, and also had a positive aggregate impact in preventing neighbourhood decay and encouraging urban renewal. These results were achieved at a low cost to the public treasury as compared to the institutional solution.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Responsive Public HousingEnvironment and Behavior, 1986
- Project renewal: An Israeli experiment in neighbourhood rehabilitationHabitat International, 1984
- Effects of Resident Control and Ownership in Self-Help HousingLand Economics, 1981
- Displacement — a not so new problem∗Habitat International, 1980
- Reactions to Rehousing: Loss of Community or Frustrated Aspirations?Urban Studies, 1979
- The Squatter Settlement as Slum or Housing Solution: Evidence from Mexico CityLand Economics, 1976
- Whither Site and Services?Science, 1976
- Relocation: Illusory Promises and No ReliefVirginia Law Review, 1971
- A Ladder Of Citizen ParticipationJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969