The chloroplast genomes of conifers lack one of the rRNA-encoding inverted repeats
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Molecular Genetics and Genomics
- Vol. 212 (1) , 6-10
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00322438
Abstract
Chloroplast DNA from species of five different conifer genera was extracted and studied by Southern blot analysis. For all these species, hybridization with heterologous probes specific for 16 S and 23 S rDNA detected only one chloroplast DNA fragment per enzyme digest. This observation suggests that the 16 S and 23 S rRNA genes are not duplicated in these genomes. The unique 16 S rDNA-containing BamHI fragment from Pinus contorta Dougl. was cloned and restriction mapped. Apart from the 16 S rRNA gene, this fragment also contained the psbC and psbD genes. It is concluded that the chloroplast genomes of a wide taxonomic range of conifers lack one of the inverted repeat elements and that a dislocation of the psbDC gene cluster has occurred in P. contorta.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmidsPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresisPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA in LarixPlant Molecular Biology, 1987
- Paternal inheritance of chloroplast DNA in Douglas-firCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1986
- Conservation of chloroplast genome structure among vascular plantsCurrent Genetics, 1986
- COMPARATIVE ORGANIZATION OF CHLOROPLAST GENOMESAnnual Review of Genetics, 1985
- Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mpl8 and pUC19 vectorsGene, 1985
- Localization and nucleotide sequence of the gene for the membrane polypeptide D2 from pea chloroplast DNAPlant Molecular Biology, 1984
- A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activityAnalytical Biochemistry, 1983
- Chloroplast DNA rearrangements are more frequent when a large inverted repeat sequence is lostCell, 1982