Tissue response to polyglycolide, polydioxanone, polylevolactide, and metallic pins in cancellous bone: An experimental study on rabbits
Open Access
- 10 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 24 (8) , 1597-1606
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20191
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate, qualitatively and histoquantitatively, the tissue response of rabbit femur cancellous bone to polyglycolide (PGA), polydioxanone (PDS), polylevolactide (PLLA), and stainless steel pins under identical conditions. Eighty knees in 50 rabbits were operated on by inserting bioabsorbable pins (PGA, PDS, or PLLA) together with metallic Kirschner wire in 60, and two metallic Kirschner wires alone in 20 knees, while 20 knees served as intact controls. Follow-up times were 3, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Cancellous bone tissue response to implants was studied using histological, histomorphometrical, microradiographical, and oxytetracycline fluorescence methods. Residual fragments of PGA and PDS were seen at 24 weeks. Complete degradation of these polymers had taken place before 52 weeks. No signs of degradation of the PLLA pins were observed within the entire follow-up period. The osteoid formation surfaces at tissue implant-interface were statistically larger in all test groups as compared to intact controls. The number of macrophages at tissue implant-interfaces increased in all bioabsorbable implant specimens until 6 weeks, and with PGA until 12 weeks. No differences in the osseous response emerged when comparing groups of bioabsorbable implants with each other or with stainless steel group. Bioabsorbable pins and metallic Kirschner wires evoked an osteoconductive response in the cancellous bone surrounding implant, but the response intensity between implants displayed no differences. This suggests a simple, nonspecific walling-off new-bone front type of response. Consequently, the polymers possessed no specific osteostimulatory or osteoinhibitory properties. Within the follow-up, no significant differences in biocompatibility between the implants appeared, and no frank inflammatory foreign-body reactions occurred. The small-volume pins obviously did not exceed the local tissue tolerance and clearing capacity of the bone. © 2006 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 24:1597–1606, 2006Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Orbital floor reconstruction with an alloplastic resorbable polydioxanone sheetInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2002
- OrbitabodenrekonstruktionHNO, 2002
- Effectiveness of operative treatment of internal orbital wall fracture with polydioxanone implantInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2001
- Comparison of the tissue response to absorbable self‐reinforced polylactide screws and metallic screws in the fixation of cancellous bone osteotomies: An experimental study on the rabbit distal femurJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1997
- Bone changes after experimental osteotomies fixed with absorbable self-reinforced poly-l-lactide screws or metallic screws studied by plain radiographs, quantitative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imagingBiomaterials, 1995
- Shear strength of a distal rabbit femur during consolidation of an osteotomy fixed with a polylactide expansion plugBiomaterials, 1994
- SURGICAL TREATMENT OF FRACTURE-DISLOCATIONS OF THE ANKLE JOINT WITH BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- Utilisation des implants biodégradables dans le traitement chirurgical des fractures et au cours des ostéotomiesEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 1992
- Reconstruction of orbital floor with polydioxanone plateInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 1991
- A histomorphological study on self‐reinforced polyglycolide (SR‐PGA) osteosynthesis implants coated with slowly absorbable polymersJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1990