Deception in Dallas: Strategic Misrepresentation in Rail Transit Promotion and Evaluation
- 30 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 56 (2) , 184-196
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369008975758
Abstract
This article describes the misuse of land-use and ridership forecasts by Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART). DART made extensive use of clearly unrealistic land use forecasts and optimistic ridership forecasts in its unsuccessful efforts to obtain voter approval for a 91-mile rail transit system. When alternative analyses indicated that the proposed $2.6-billion rail system would carry only slightly more riders than an unimproved bus system, DART tried to conceal the information. Subsequently, when a citizen's group obtained the release of these unfavorable findings, DART attempted to mislead voters about their significance and released cost-effectiveness analyses based on earlier, and clearly incorrect, ridership forecasts.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Choosing the wrong technology: Or how to spend billions and reduce transit useJournal of Advanced Transportation, 1988
- A note on trends in transit commuting in the United States relating to employment in the central business districtTransportation Research Part A: General, 1986
- A Dark Side to Light Rail? The Experience of Three New Transit SystemsJournal of the American Planning Association, 1985
- The Urban Transportation ProblemPublished by Harvard University Press ,1965